Find the gap. Leave with a plan.
Authorized assessments, penetration testing, and framework gap analysis delivered with priorities, evidence, and remediation ownership.
An assessment with a usable remediation plan.
Review the engagement before starting a conversation. Final scope, fees and delivery dates are confirmed in a written proposal.
- A useful fit
- You need to understand an application’s exposure, evaluate specific controls or prepare evidence for a security review.
- First engagement
- Agree the assessment type, applications or assets, environments, framework if applicable, exclusions and written authorization.
- What you receive
- An executive summary, technical findings with supporting evidence, prioritized remediation and a findings review.
- What we need from you
- An asset list, system owner, business context, approved access, test windows and rules of engagement. Request the proposed assessor’s relevant experience during scoping.
- How we review the work
- Findings identify affected assets, evidence, risk context, practical remediation and an owner. Confirm remediation review and any retest scope in the proposal.
- What determines the quote
- Quoted by asset or application count, complexity, access model, assessment depth and reporting requirements. Retesting and additional environments are stated separately.
- Timing
- The written scope sets testing dates, report delivery and review milestones, subject to authorization and access.
- Scope and exclusions
- Testing stays within written authorization. A readiness or gap assessment is not a formal certification, legal opinion or guarantee that no vulnerabilities remain.
Choose the assessment that fits the decision.
The engagement is scoped before testing, and security testing proceeds only with written authorization.
Broad technical coverage.
Combine automated discovery with manual validation to identify and prioritize weaknesses across an agreed surface.
- Authorized scope
- Manual validation
- Risk-ranked findings
A short path from scope to owned action.
The sequence stays visible so expectations, authorization, evidence, and ownership do not disappear inside the engagement.
- 01
Scope
Define objectives, systems, exclusions, and authorization.
- 02
Test
Execute automated and manual assessment procedures.
- 03
Prove
Validate findings and assemble supporting evidence.
- 04
Plan
Deliver ownership, priority, and ticket-ready remediation.
Know what the engagement delivers.
- Executive summary
- Technical findings
- Evidence package
- Remediation workshop
Testing is performed only against systems covered by written authorization and agreed rules of engagement.
Turn assessment findings into owned work.
Tell us the system, decision, deadline, and framework involved.